Around five football fields of tropical forest have been illegally cleared every minute between 2000 and 2012 according to a new report.
The authors say that consumer demand in
Europe and the US for beef, leather and timber is driving these
losses.
The vast majority of this illegal
deforestation for commercial agriculture took place in Brazil and
Indonesia.
The authors say the practice is
spreading rapidly in Asia and Africa.
The research has been carried out
by Forest Trends, a US based, non-governmental organisation that
includes environmentalists, industry and the financial sector.
Their report focuses on the
question of illegality. While the cutting down of tropical forests
has been an issue of global concern for several decades, knowing
what's legal and illegal has been much more difficult to ascertain.
This new study argues that in the first
12 years of this century, 49% of tropical deforestation was due to
illegal conversion for commercial agriculture.
The authors say consumer demand in the
EU and elsewhere for agricultural commodities is the main driver for
these clearances that have seen more than 200,000 sq km of forest
laid bare.
The report values this trade in
commodities including timber, leather, beef, soy and palm oil at
$61bn a year.
"I think it will come as a shock
to a lot of people, even to people who work on deforestation,"
lead author Sam Lawson told BBC News.
"People are often blind to the
illegalities or don't see them for what they are in terms of the
scale."
Deadly consequences
Much of these forest clearances are
illegal, but governments don't have the capacity to enforce their own
law. Licences and permits to cut the trees are often acquired through
corruption.
This can have significant, sometimes
deadly implications for the indigenous communities that live in these
forests.
In recent days in Peru, four
indigenous campaigners were murdered for their opposition to
illegal land clearances.
In Brazil, where large amounts of this
type of deforestation have taken place, the authorities aremaking
strenuous efforts to tackle the problem.
One reason they have had success is
they have started to hit the corporations involved, in their pockets
- blocking access to credit for example, for companies involved in
illegal clearing.
The authors believe that consumer
countries like the European Union could be doing much more to tackle
the problem.
"At the moment EU is giving large
amounts of money to these tropical countries to reduce deforestation
while at the same time it is shooting itself in the foot by importing
all these dodgy products from illegal clearances," said Sam
Lawson.
"It needs to close that vicious
circle, it needs to stop importing these products as a first step."
The research team believe that the
example of tropical timber could be a role model for tackling beef,
leather and palm oil from illegal sources.
Back in the 1980s, there were attempts
to ban these imports but these floundered. There were also
certification schemes that met a similar fate.
Ultimately, according to the
researchers, countries realised that the only thing that would work
were strong regulations and not voluntary actions.
"In the EU we now have laws saying
that companies have to do due diligence on their timber to make sure
it was legally produced," said Sam Lawson.
"What is needed is equivalent
legislation regarding these commodities including palm oil, soy and
beef."
The biggest concern right now for
campaigners is the spread of illegal deforestation to new countries
in Latin America, Africa and Asia.
They point to Papua New Guinea where
millions of hectares of forest have been licensed for deforestation
in recent years. A parliamentary inquiry found that 90% of these
licences were issued by corrupt or fraudulent means.
All these land clearances are making a
significant contribution to global warming.
The report estimates that in the period
2000-2012, carbon dioxide equivalent to a quarter of the EU's annual
total was emitted every year.
Developed countries have embarked on an
ambitious programme to pay developing nations to stop cutting down
the trees. But Sam Lawson thinks this is doomed to failure.
"It is pointless paying a
government to change its policies when these governments are
incapable of implementing and enforcing their policies in the first
place."
(source: BBC)